Aaron Cappuccio

Fisheries and Oceans Canada · Government of Canada

Gap Analysis Dashboard

Restructuring a data-heavy research platform so scientists and government stakeholders can explore, compare, and interpret complex ecosystem data.

Company
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Role
UX/UI Designer (Co-op)
Timeline
January – April 2025
Focus
Research · Information architecture · Data visualization
Gap Analysis Dashboard final interface

Context

A research platform for ecosystem data

DFO scientists use an internal Ecosystem Variables dashboard to see where marine data coverage is strong and where gaps remain. During a four-month co-op, I redesigned the path from first login to finding a variable, reading its coverage, and sharing a finding.

Ecosystem Variables dashboard tile showing a variable checklist beside a heatmap of Canada with a coverage legend

The Problem

Expert users, no clear path through the data

Variables, a map, and results were all exposed at once with nothing connecting them. Users knew what they needed, but not where to find it.

Tile listing where users got stuck: finding variables, disconnected map and results, low map resolution, no sharing, no onboarding

My Role

What I owned

As UX/UI designer, I ran usability testing, restructured the information architecture, and designed filtering, navigation, data detail, and onboarding with researchers and stakeholders.

Research / What I Learned

Where the experience was breaking down

Interviews and usability sessions with data analysts showed how they search, interpret, and share ecological data.

Workflow journey from search to share with friction points at unclear names, disconnected map exploration, and off-platform sharing

Four patterns behind every later decision

01

Finding variables

Users did not know where to start.

02

Disconnected workflow

Navigation, map, and results felt like separate steps.

03

Too much at once

Complexity was exposed up front.

04

Trust in the data

Experts needed source and timestamps.

Finding → Design Response

From research findings to design decisions

Four research findings each paired with its design response: browse, search and filter; map into analysis; persistent metadata; comments and links

Information Architecture

Restructuring the platform around how researchers work

Before touching any screen, I reorganized the product into six areas, each with one clear job.

Information architecture diagram for the EOS Gap-Analysis Dashboard showing six areas: Explore Map, EV Categories, Analysis Workflow, Insights and Outputs, Workspace, and Support, with their sub-pages

Iterations & Trade-offs

Balancing flexibility with clarity

Each stage was tested with researchers before the next began, so depth of control never cost a readable path.

Design process: synthesize, restructure, sketch, refine, with a loop labelled tested with researchers

Testing structure before visual detail

Low-fidelity wireframes tested navigation, the map, and onboarding before any visual detail.

Low-fidelity wireframe of the data exploration and map screen
Low-fidelity wireframe of the guided onboarding tutorial flow

Final Experience

A clearer path from exploration to analysis

Experts keep precise control while the route through the platform stays obvious. Users filter by variable and biogeographic region, draw custom areas on the map, and read heatmaps at finer spatial detail.

  • Filtering by variables and regions, with active filters always visible
  • Higher-resolution heatmaps with zoom
  • Metadata panel showing source, timestamp, and description
  • Comments and shareable dataset links
  • Guided onboarding for new users
Animated walkthrough of the guided onboarding tutorial
Animated demonstration of leaving a comment on a dataset and sharing a link

Outcome & Impact

A stronger foundation for scientific exploration

The redesigned workflow gives researchers a clearer sequence through the data, rather than leaving them to piece it together themselves.

01

Findable variables

Categories, search, and filters are designed to give every ecosystem variable a clear route in.

02

One connected workflow

Navigation, map, and results are structured as a single path rather than three separate tools.

03

Readable coverage

Heatmaps, legends, and metadata are designed to show where data is strong, where gaps remain, and where it came from.

04

Less guesswork

Active filters, zoom, and onboarding reduce the need to already know the system.

Built to be extended

The new information architecture and design system give the team a stable base for future datasets and features. Advanced functionality only helps when both expert and non-technical users understand what the system is showing and what to do next.

As this was a Government of Canada project, a portion of the research, iteration, and stakeholder work sits behind confidentiality agreements with Fisheries and Oceans Canada and isn’t shown here.

Next projectManeuver Men’s Grooming